Laughing at the misfortune of others

On the 16th September the Daily Mail published the following article.  Unlike the previous post I’ll be adding a link so you, the reader, can see what the title was originally, I’ll post screen shots below so if you don’t want to click the link and increase their revenue you don’t have to.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2422196/Police-officers-funniest-injuries-revealed-Washing-alcohol-hand-gel-blamed-ridiculous-accidents-stations.html

Lets dissect this a little, “Police Officers funniest injuries” (emphasis mine). The title has now however been changed, although the tab title remains the same.  Some of the injuries sound either serious, or extremely painful including the officer who who was scalded by coffee after it was superheated in a microwave, the officer who was sustained a neck injury after a whiteboard fell on them and the officer who tore ligaments during training.  It’s wonderful to see a national paper with a distribution of over 1,500,000 and a website which receives (as of May 2013) 8.2 million unique visitors a day laughing at injuries that would have resulted in hospital treatment, such a lack of basic humanity is appalling.

Image

The article starts with a glaring error, that these are claims of any type.  These are accident reports, any organisation with more than 10 employees is required by law to maintain records of all accidents that result in injury (no matter how minor).  The records are not ‘claims’ nor ‘potential claims’ these are injuries that people would have suffered at work.  So unless the officer who injured his back while switching on a computer has instructed a lawyer to seek damages this is not in any way a claim.

Image

Yet again this article confuses accident reports with claims.  There is nothing to suggest within the FOI request that these officers have sought damages from their employer yet the article continues to make this error that accident reports are claims.

The article then moves onto the well publicised incident involving PC Kelly Jones, who in the course of her duties sustained personal harm and was initially seeking compensation for this harm.  There have been numerous articles deriding her for this course of action and the claim has since been dropped.  I am aware that there is at least one Constabulary within the UK that allows officers and staff to use their compensation to repay the Constabulary for their sick leave therefore reducing the cost to the public purse.

Image

We then move onto a quote from the Taxpayers Alliance.  The Taxpayers Alliance appears to be an organisation funded by wealthy tory donors rather than a true grassroots organisation.  Unfortunately, assuming Mr. Sinclair has been correctly quoted or had the correct information presented to him, he also falls into the same error that accident reports of claims of any type which we already know they are not.  Mr, Sinclair states that some of these accidents are simply that: accidents.  This is true, and the purpose of accident reports is so that employers can review what is happening and ensure their risk assessments are adequate to ensure that further accidents do not occur.  While this process seems onerous it is right that individual Constabularies put into place processes that prevent accidents so that Officers and staff are not injured at work as this means the cost to the public purse is reduced.

Image

It is worrying that the Mail, which is obliged to be fair and seek out both sides to a discussion, devotes so much time to this article yet only allows the Police Federation a single paragraph in response, I do not know how much the Federation sent as a reply however to not even give the common courtesy of naming the spokesperson speaks volumes.

Oh, and one other thing.  PC Jones is not WPC Jones.  The W was dropped years ago – the sex of an officer is in no way an indicator of their ability to perform and using titles that suggest otherwise is simply demeaning.  The W harks back to the days when male officers of equivalent ranks outranked the female officers simply because of their sex and the W was a mark to show this.

Image

Speaking of balance, a further negative response is then added by an unnamed retired officer and by an additional unnamed serving officer, with no further response in mitigation.

The remainder of the article then lists some of the injuries suffered by serving officers.

It worries me that there are continued attacks on the police, especially from a paper that derides the lack of respect for law and order within the UK.  It is very odd that a paper can complain of a lack of respect yet humiliate officers in this way.

It is worth reminding people of some of the more serious injuries that officers receive. They are shot, stabbed time and time and time again, they are run over, headbutted and have their jaws fractured among other injuries.  It is also worth noting that while the UK average sick leave is 6 days per person per year for the police it is 8.  Considering the injuries they receive, the incidents they attend and the extended amount they spend driving – including at night (which are all risk factors for injuries) I would suggest the rate of absence is entirely acceptable.  Articles such as the one above mock the police for no other reason than to ridicule them and attack them.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Laughing at the misfortune of others

  1. Yvonne H Jones

    This just goes to show how misleading some journalistic articles are and this paper is always doing this, hence the reason I have not read this Tory rag for over a decade!
    Good well written and an obviously researched article by your good selves, unlike the the article in the Daily Fail (not a sic!)

    Reply
    1. adifferentviewpoint2013 Post author

      It was articles such as this that made me want to start this blog. I was getting more and more angry and decided that instead of paying GSK to lower my blood pressure it would be better to write this blog. It takes a little while to write each piece but I think (and hope) it’s more than worth it.

      Thanks for the feedback , and I too refer to the paper that way so I knew what you meant!

      Reply
    1. adifferentviewpoint2013 Post author

      Thank you for publicising this on your FB page – I’ll be more than happy to keep in touch. If you want I can let you know when I publish my next blog? Unfortunately I don’t know when that will be as it depends on the abysmal reporting talent of the Mail.

      Reply
      1. Dave

        If you’re waiting for the Mail to publish something factually incorrect and derogatory, I can’t imagine you’ll have very long to wait at all…

      2. Richard Sawyer

        Regarding the above. Great article, well written and to the point. Waiting for more “abysmal reporting” from the Daily Mail? Blimey, you’ ld never leave your computer! I’m not a Copper but can’t stand ill informed idiots writing stuff about a job they would never have the intelligence, guts or common sense to even attempt. Cheers.

  2. grumpynortherner

    The DMs attack on the police for wearing ppe, not accepting death and injury as part of the job is offensive. They would not dare to make such suggestions about our colleagues in the military due to potential public outcry. But such DM comments have to be seen as aimed at all crown servants who serve the country and should accept injury and death. This is outrageous and the emergency services and armed forces should boycott the DM and hit these morons in the pocket.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s